Self-driving cars and Darwin

Self-driving cars are in the news these days as the technology starts to gel and businesses begin to make strategic investments.

self-drivingCarIt’s certainly an exciting breakthrough. Self-driving cars have the potential to reduce traffic jams and use the road system more efficiently. That could make an immediate difference in my neighborhood, where many drivers have trouble navigating a roundabout and are unclear on the concept of the four-way stop.

Self-driving cars could make a dramatic improvement in public safety by preventing many traffic accidents. Drunk driving could become a thing of the past, and senility would no longer limit mobility for senior citizens.

I have only one quibble. Driving motor vehicles is an opportunity for the least intelligent and most foolhardy members of our species to improve the gene pool by removing themselves from it. I’m a big fan of the Darwin Awards. Self-driving cars will allow the worst drivers to survive and reproduce. This may not be a good thing.

Darwin’s natural selection does not work in my adopted home state of New Mexico because motorists rarely encounter traffic. Our sparsely populated hinterland is safe for inept, inattentive and inebriated drivers who would never survive a big-city freeway. Bad driving may be genetic here, with entire families who have not used a turn signal in generations. That may be why my auto insurance rates went up when I moved from Chicago to Albuquerque.

JaywalkingI have similar reservations about jaywalking laws. In the city neighborhood where I grew up, jaywalking was part of our heritage. Our mothers taught us to look both ways when crossing streets or playing in the traffic, and children grew up agile and smart.

I once attended a conference in Seattle, which has particularly strict jaywalking laws. When I walked back to my hotel late at night, the streets were deserted with hardly a car in sight. Yet lonely groups of pedestrians were dutifully waiting at the curb for the traffic light to change. They gave me incredulous looks as I confidently strode across the empty streets. It was eerie.

I guess it’s compassionate to help people who do not have the sense to look both ways. But do we really want people who can’t cross a street to populate the next generation (or the next election)?

So I worry a little about the impact of self-driving cars and jaywalking laws, but the human race probably will continue to evolve. After all, we still have motorcycles.

Posted in Commentary, Idle Ruminations | 2 Comments

Breaking the partisan package deal

I’ve found it increasingly hard to identify with either political party because the basic principles that used to define Democrats and Republicans have evolved as both parties purged their moderates. Party members now must support an increasingly cumbersome package of rigid positions on a growing list of issues.

The Democratic party traditionally has stood for a strong central government, supported organized labor and, since the 1960s, has embraced civil rights and an anti-war foreign policy. That package has expanded in recent years to include:

  • Unlimited access to abortion without restrictions
  • Elimination of religious influence in government
  • Extension of civil rights to gay/lesbian and now transgender folks
  • Expanding government regulation to every sector of the economy
  • Higher taxes
  • Expansion of welfare
  • Government spending to stimulate the economy
  • Supporting government employee unions and resisting government accountability
  • Opposition to school choice
  • Reducing military budgets and placing restrictions on military operations
  • Support for the Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter movements
  • Unrestricted immigration and legalization of illegal immigrants
  • An environmental agenda to eliminate fossil fuels
  • Neutrality in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Nor have Republicans been idle. The Republican tradition has included emphasis on private business as an engine of economic growth, a strong military and relatively muscular foreign policy. The Reagan era and hijacking of the party by right-wing Christians expanded the portfolio to include:

  • Absolute opposition to abortion
  • Incorporation of religious principles into law, including opposition to gay marriage
  • Tax cuts as a way of stimulating the economy
  • Reducing government regulation and increasing economic freedom
  • Restrictions on unions and support for right-to-work laws
  • Support for the Tea Party
  • Reducing welfare
  • Increasing military budgets and supporting overseas military intervention
  • Support for school choice
  • Taking Israel’s side
  • Border security and limited immigration
  • Energy independence and expansion of fossil fuel production

I keep thinking of more issues to add to these lists but do not want to spend the rest of the day doing this.

Regardless of which party you join, you’re obligated to support the whole package as an all-or-nothing proposition. The Chinese-restaurant-menu approach – one from column A, one from column B – is not an option in the voting booth. That may be why a record 43% of Americans now identify as political independents, outnumbering those who claim allegiance to either party.

But this year may be different. Republicans have their golf pants in a wad because Donald Trump, their presumptive Presidential nominee, has broken the party’s package. They’re howling because their candidate is NOT a conservative. He wants to rebuild the military but opposes military intervention, is pro-business but anti-trade. Trump’s position on social and religious issues can best be summed up as “whatever.” Pundits are saying this is the end of conservatism and they’re probably right. Blame it on those pesky voters.

Meanwhile, Democrats are expanding their package thanks to Bernie Sanders. Double the minimum wage! Free college! Transgender bathroom rights! Solar panels for coal miners after we kill their jobs! Not to mention a permanent state of obligatory outrage at whatever Trump says.

The irony is that after all the drama about candidates’ position on issues, and the unforgiveable sin of changing positions, voters will make up their minds about what really matters: whether Hillary Clinton is a crook or Trump is a racist.

Posted in Commentary | Comments Off on Breaking the partisan package deal

What democracy looks like

Democracy is a fighting word these days. The latest political brawl is over charges that selection of delegates to the Democratic and Republican conventions is undemocratic. Voters in both parties are angry because they believe the Establishment (whoever that is) is running things without the consent of the governed.

Sen. Bernie Sanders is calling for a revolution (without pitchforks and guillotines, I hope) to transform the country into a socialist paradise. Donald Trump is seeking popular support to make deals behind closed doors. A few years ago union supporters protested against Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and chanted: “This is what democracy looks like.” Voters disagreed and demonstrated that democracy looks more like a ballot box than a mob.

My model of democracy has always been my hometown of Oak Park, Illinois: a Chicago suburb of about 50,000 that produced Frank Lloyd

Frank Lloyd Wright's digs

Frank Lloyd Wright’s digs

Wright, Ernest Hemingway and one of the country’s first fair housing laws. My parents moved there a few years after citizens tossed out corrupt politicians in 1952 and elected a new municipal government with a hired village manager and nonpartisan village board.

The Village Manager Association has dominated local elections ever since because it’s not a political party. Its function is to screen candidates for village office with an open, widely representative selection process that embraces insurgents. I once served on the 50-person nominating committee even though I was not a member of the association.

Citizen participation in Oak Park went on steroids in the late 1960s after racial change swept the adjacent West Side of Chicago. The village government responded with a commitment to integration and renewal, and mobilized the community to make it happen.

After I bought my first house in Oak Park in 1969, I was recruited for a village-sponsored citizen committee to guide a new comprehensive plan in a serious of fractious public meetings. My wife and I also joined an independent community organization that pressured the village to improve police protection and picketed local banks to fight racial discrimination in mortgages. The organization disbanded a few years later when all its objectives were met.

Oak Park launched a dizzying array of initiatives to upgrade apartment downtown-oak-park-il-435x326buildings, beautify the community, enforce fair housing, improve the parks and more. Every initiative was driven by a village commission, committee or task force of citizen volunteers working with village staff – including a task force on which I served to select new street lights. It was said that if all the committees were disbanded the divorce rate would skyrocket.

I wound up working on several initiatives and that was not unusual. Hundreds of ordinary residents did as much or more because village officials welcomed anybody who wanted to volunteer.

Virtually every segment of the community was engaged. A nonprofit association conducted a marketing program to attract new residents to racially integrated neighborhoods. My wife was in a church-basement women’s group that came up with a program to insure homeowners against loss resulting from racial change. Realtors supported a ban on for-sale signs even after the law was overturned in court. Local businesses formed an economic development partnership with the village, and I served on its board in the 1980s (with presidents of the banks I used to picket).

The result was a successful, lively, racially diverse community that continues today. The process was often disorderly, with impassioned arguments at every meeting. But it was democracy and it worked.

I think about Oak Park often these days. My adopted hometown of Albuquerque is pushing through a rapid-transit system that practically nobody wants while the rest of the city falls apart. I’d like to think that citizens can do what we did in Oak Park to turn around the city. Or the state, or the country.

Posted in Family stories, Idle Ruminations, Oak Park | Comments Off on What democracy looks like

Bringing the Civil War to life in New Mexico

When we saw a couple of women in hoop skirts and sunbonnets walking across the dusty parking lot, we knew we were in the right place: the annual re-enactment of the Civil War Battle of Valverde near Socorro, NM.

The New Mexico campaign is a Civil War footnote. Confederate Brigadier General Henry Hopkins Sibley invaded the New Mexico Territory with a brigade of Texas volunteers in a grand scheme to capture the Colorado gold fields and open a supply route to California. His force of 2,500 men met a Union force of about 3,000 from nearby Fort Craig at Valverde ford on the Rio Grande in February 1862.

highres_447302775Before the battle we wandered through the Union and Confederate camps, where re-enactors were living in rustic comfort with canvas tents and folding wood furniture. Womenfolk and kids in vintage costume were cooking hearty meals over campfires, though a few hardcore re-enactors subsist on coffee and crackers that simulate Civil War hardtack.

Despite their zeal for roughing it with historical accuracy, the re-enactors were more comfortable than their 1862 counterparts. The Confederate invaders were lightly equipped and learned that living off the land is not a good strategy in the New Mexico desert. Shortly before the battle of Valverde they lost some of their supply wagons and mules in a skirmish, and were desperately short of water because the Union battle line was between them and the Rio Grande.

Civil War re-enacting is a serious hobby. An “authentic” wool uniform costs around $200 and working-replica muskets are $700. Vintage tents start at around $200. One re-enactor couple even had a Matthew Brady-style camera and their very own cannon. A weekend Civil Warrior may need a fatter checkbook than the average golfer.

Re-enactors come from all walks of life. We met a history professor and a grad IMG_2223student. A few women wore uniforms instead of hoop skirts and carried muskets. There’s also a lot of fraternization with the “enemy.” The Confederate and Union camps were about 50 yards apart. One re-enactor told me he owns both Union and Confederate uniforms and joins whichever side needs to fill its ranks.

No re-enactor admitted to playing the role of Confederate Gen. Sibley, who had a drinking problem and was “indisposed” in his tent during the entire battle.

This year’s battle left much to the imagination. The re-enactment site is about 30 miles north of the Valverde ford, where shifting of the river’s course obliterated a battlefield that’s now part of Ted Turner’s wildlife reserve. Spectators set up folding chairs on a bridge overlooking the scene, and a narrator with a megaphone described what was happening.

By necessity, re-enactments are a microcosm of Civil War battles that involved tens of IMG_2228thousands of troops. On this day a couple of dozen re-enactors represented about 5,000 soldiers in both armies. Unlike the re-enactment I attended a few years ago, neither army had horses (and, happily, did not attempt to simulate cavalry with Monty Python coconut shells).

Still, the re-enactors soldiered on and accurately portrayed a Confederate infantry charge that captured a battery of Union cannon. The mini-armies exchanged cannon shots and musket volleys across an open field. Then the Confederates advanced and a few soldiers on both sides fell as “casualties.” (In larger re-enactments, participants draw cards to select casualties in advance.) A final Confederate charge overran the Union line and the battle was over. Then the casualties came back to life, and everybody shook hands and lined up to pose for pictures.

The original battle of Valverde was a costly Confederate victory. Sibley’s depleted force marched on to capture Albuquerque and occupy Santa Fe. They had expected local farm workers to rise up against their Spanish landlords and join their army, but New Mexicans disliked Texans more and supported the Union.

The final battle of the New Mexico campaign took place a month later at Glorieta Pass, northeast of Santa Fe. The Confederates again won the battle but a Union raiding party, guided by local Hispanics, attacked the rear of the Confederate force and destroyed its supply train – forcing the Confederates to retreat back to Texas.

This year’s battle had a happier ending. The re-enactors strolled back to their camps for lunch, to gather later in nearby Socorro for a Civil War fashion show and “fandango” party. My friends and I got in our cars and left the field in search of green chile cheeseburgers.

Posted in Idle Ruminations, Life in New Mexico | Comments Off on Bringing the Civil War to life in New Mexico

New Year’s resolutions at the gym

I’m in the habit of going to the gym nearly every day. As the holidays drew to a close I was steeling myself for big New Year’s resolution crowds at my local Planet Fitness in Albuquerque, but so far have seen only a few more perspiring patrons than usual during my mid-morning workout.

That’s a welcome change from the chain health club I used to frequent in the Chicago suburbs. The large gym was busy, especially in the peak hours after work, but I always was able to drop in and work out with relative convenience.

Until January, that is. Every year the chain conducted an aggressive Christmas promotion with saturation advertising and discounts on gym memberships. I admired the savvy marketing but was dismayed at the resulting invasion of newcomers.

The post-holiday horde inundated the locker room and parking lot, forcing me to change at home and park at a nearby shopping center. Getting onto a treadmill was nearly impossible. The first couple of aerobics classes were downright hazardous, a demolition derby of randomly flailing limbs. I soon learned to just avoid the place the first few days of the year.

Fortunately, the crowds began to diminish after a week or two. According to national statistics, 80% of new exercisers stop coming to the gym by February. The aerobics program at my local gym saw even faster attrition because the instructor, a cheerful young woman with a sadistic streak, weeded out the faint-hearted in a matter of days by stepping-up the intensity of her classes.

Within a few weeks, the gym was back to normal and the chain’s managers were counting the money from new one-year memberships that went unused.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | Comments Off on New Year’s resolutions at the gym

Enduring the year-end story

Much as I enjoy the holidays, I’m always relieved when they’re over and we can stumble into the new year with renewed optimism. I always look forward to celebrating Christmas with family, and ringing in the new year with friends and festivities. But what gets me down are the year-end stories with which the news media bombard us from Christmas through New Year’s Eve.

Not that there’s anything wrong with reviewing the past year as we enter a new one. It’s part of human nature that shows up in every culture. I do it in my annual Christmas letter to friends and relations. The spirit of review and renewal wears thin, however, when the last days of every year bring a deluge of the year’s highlights in politics, crime, finance, fashion, entertainment, sports, celebrity deaths, etc. The only year-end story I genuinely enjoy reading is Dave Barry’s parody of the genre.

I am sensitive to this because I was a grudging perpetrator of year-end stories for much of my career as a newspaper reporter, publicist and employee publication editor. If there’s anything more tedious than reading year-end stories it’s writing the damn things. I suspect harried newspaper editors embraced year-end stories as a way of filling the expanded editorial space created by Christmas-sale advertising.

Whatever its origins, the year-end story has taken on a tradition of its own. I gritted my teeth and pounded out year-end news releases because employers and clients demanded them and newspapers occasionally published them to fill space. I ran year-end stories in company publications because my bosses and readers expected them and I had space to fill, too. TV stations and cable news outlets pre-record year-end roundups to fill airtime when reporters and anchors are on vacation. Even though space-filling is not an issue on the Internet, year-end stories abound online.

So every year professional scribes are assigned to write year-end stories just because it’s the end of the year and perhaps – perhaps – somebody will read them. I’m grateful that retirement has freed me from this annual chore. Except, of course, for that Christmas letter to friends and relations that I enjoy writing.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | 2 Comments

Whose boots on the ground?

After a weekend of round-the-clock news coverage of the terrorist attacks in Paris, I am appalled by the depravity of the terrorists and dismayed by the reaction of politicians and pundits.

We’re seeing some stark contrasts. At the same time the president of France was calling the attack an act of war, Democratic presidential candidates were refusing to use the term “radical Islam.” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ claim that climate change is still the greatest threat to national security was downright bizarre.

A more hopeful sign, which received practically no news coverage, is that Muslim leaders around the world also condemned the Paris attacks.

I hope President Obama resists the pressure to commit American ground troops to the conflict in the Middle East. That would play into the apocalyptic ISIS narrative of a great battle with a Crusader army.

The greater danger is that President Obama has an unfortunate habit of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. If shamed into sending troops, he is likely to deploy an insufficient force with inadequate support. His aversion to waging war will hamstring our troops with restrictive rules of engagement and political micromanagement. The result will be needless loss of American lives.

More air strikes in Syria won’t solve the problem. ISIS will have to be defeated on the ground, preferably by pissed-off Sunni Muslim soldiers from Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey. The model for this is the coalition we saw in the Persian Gulf war in 1991-91, minus the massive commitment of American ground forces. The U.S. needs to lead this coalition because nobody else has the military capability to coordinate and support multinational warfare.

Middle Eastern ground forces have limitations on their own, but can be highly effective if they’re backed up by American and NATO air power, technology and support. The role of U.S. and European forces should be to provide close air support, advisers, search and rescue, logistics, special operations and coordinated communication and intelligence.

The Paris attack is motivating the world to undertake what is likely to be a generational campaign to eliminate the threat of radical Islam. Our allies in Europe and the Middle East appear to be willing and ready to join the fight.

All that’s missing is leadership.

Posted in Commentary | 1 Comment

Pumpkins in the air

Pumpkin chunking! Elaborate, home-made machines hurl ripe pumpkins high into the air to smash down hundreds of yards away. What’s not to like?

IMG_2199

Pumpkin chunking under the New Mexico sky

I stumbled across the World Championship Punkin Chunkin on cable TV a few years ago and was immediately fascinated by this odd sport’s  geek/redneck eccentricity: Big Bang Theory meets Dukes of Hazzard. So when I heard about the annual pumpkin chunking festival in Estancia, NM, I just had to be there.

Estancia is a small town about an hour’s drive over the mountains from Albuquerque, down a straight road through billiard-table flatlands of farms and ranches. The pumpkin chunking contest was started by local farmers 20 years ago and evolved into a full-blown local festival. I missed the town parade and by the time I arrived, Estancia’s main street was eerily empty. As I approached the field on the outskirts of town, I saw the chunking machines towering over most of the population of Estancia. I parked in a dusty field, trudged past the kiddie carnival, funnel cake and green-chile cheeseburger vendors, and found a seat in the bleachers.

IMG_2203

An air cannon fires

The machines, about 10 of them lined up at the edge of the field, had colorful names such as Chunk Wagon, Patriot, The Judge and (with an all-female crew) Bea Dazzled. Most were air cannons that use compressed air to propel an eight to 10-lb pumpkin through a gun barrel up to 100 feet long. Chunking enthusiasts spend tens of thousands of dollars to build these behemoths and tow them on trailers to places like Estancia and, if they succeed, to the world championship in Delaware.

It’s not a fast-paced competition. An air horn sounds and a pumpkin is launched with a loud whoosh. You have to look hard to see the pumpkin flying through the air: I missed it most of the time. Then there’s a wait for the ground crew to locate the pumpkin and record the distance of the shot. That’s a little easier in New Mexico because the pumpkin kicks up a cloud of dust when it hits the ground. The ground crew, sheltering from errant pumpkins in a horse trailer downrange, races to the point of impact in an ATV and radios the distance to the referees. Some of the air cannons recorded shots of more than 2,000 feet, nowhere near the world record of more than a mile but still impressive.

IMG_2193

A muzzle-loader

Using produce as cannonballs is an inexact science. Some pumpkins disintegrate upon leaving the cannon barrel in a phenomenon known as pie. “There’s more pie on the field,” the announcer said.

Impressive as the air cannons were, I wish I’d seen more trebuchets: modern versions of medieval siege engines that use a counterweight, long lever and sling to fling projectiles. It’s fascinating to watch the ungainly contraptions (and wonder whether they’ll fall apart).

I’m not sure who won because I didn’t stick around. The winner didn’t much matter to me because I got such a kick out of watching the pointless but satisfying spectacle of big machines… chunking pumpkins.

Posted in Idle Ruminations, Life in New Mexico | 2 Comments

Two cheers for Columbus

Today is Columbus Day in the United States. But in Albuquerque it’s been re-named Indigenous Peoples Day to commemorate the struggles of Native Americans against genocidal invaders like good old Chris.

What makes this a little odd is that about half the population of New Mexico is descended from Spanish Conquistadores. Many families here trace their ancestry back to Spain because the invaders brought their priests with them and kept good records. It’s worth noting that even though the holiday has been re-named, Hispanics who work for the government still get the day off.

Columbus was no saint, of course. But he paved the way for the recently canonized Junipero Serra, who converted indigenous folks in California to Catholicism at gunpoint in the Eighteenth Century.

Nor did Columbus & Co. invent the custom of obliterating native populations when expanding your nation’s boundaries. Ethnic cleansing probably has been going on since the Cro-Magnons displaced the Neanderthals. The Vietnamese invaded neighboring Champa in 1471. Indigenous populations were devastated when Russia conquered Siberia, the Chinese occupied Mongolia and the Japanese were extremely unkind to the Ainu.

Genocide is not limited to advanced countries invading more primitive ones. Left to their own devices, indigenous people in more recent times have slaughtered one another with particular relish in places like Rwanda, Congo, East Timor and Myanmar.

The good news is that the United States and other countries, such as Canada and Australia, recognized the error of their ways early in the last century and have been making amends to their native populations. Our taxes are paying for the sins of our great-grandfathers by subsidizing Native American welfare with the enthusiastic support of most Americans. Indigenous Peoples Day activism is a reminder that this still is a work in progress.

I find it a little ironic, however, that some of the same folks who claim America is still a genocidal country are celebrating an agreement with Iran, which broadcasts its intention to wipe Israel off the map. It’s a little hypocritical to wallow in retroactive guilt over attempts to wipe out Native American culture a century ago while being indifferent to today’s obliteration of indigenous Christian cultures in the Middle East.

Here in New Mexico, Native Americans may be getting the last laugh. The Secretary of State, a descendant of Spanish colonists, has been charged with gambling away campaign funds in casinos… owned by Native Americans.

Posted in Commentary, Life in New Mexico | Comments Off on Two cheers for Columbus

Feeding the hummingbirds

It’s hummingbird season at my house.

The Rio Grande, a few hundred yards from my house, is a bird superhighway with seasonal flyovers of geese and sandhill cranes. Quail and roadrunners trot across my yard every day. But the hummingbirds put on the best show.

I read about hummingbirds as a child but never saw one until I came to New Mexico. They’re tiny crittHummingbirdsers, about three inches long, with short, rapidly moving wings that allow them to hover and a needle-like beak that taps the nectar from flowers. They actually do hum, though it’s more of an angry, insect-like buzz generated by wings that beat about 80 times per second.

You wouldn’t think birds that feed on flowers would flock to an area that’s mostly desert, but apparently there’s enough vegetation in the Rio Grande valley for them to thrive. So if you want to see hummingbirds in Albuquerque, all you have to do is hang out a feeder with faux nectar and they will show up.

The hummingbirds arrive at my house in late April and patronize my feeders through the summer. Traffic picks up in August, perhaps because there are fewer flowers and my sugar-and-water hummingbird chow is the next best thing. Their extremely high metabolism makes them sugar junkies.

I have two feeders outside my office window. Each one holds about a quart of liquid, which lasts a week or so in the spring. Now I refill the feeders every day with a mixture of one part sugar to four parts of water, and am considering buying sugar in bulk at Costco.

The hummingbirds swoop in, hover and dip their beaks into the flower-shaped nozzles of the feeders. Sometimes they perch on the feeder but often stay airborne while feeding. Then they fly backwards a few inches, hover for a moment and go back in for seconds or thirds. When not pigging out they hang out in a nearby tree and beat an airborne path back and forth to the feeders. The cats and I enjoy watching them through the window.

Cute as they are, the hummingbirds are voracious and fierce. When I go out to change the feeders several of them whizz past my head. If the feeders are empty for a while one or two hummingbirds zoom up to the window and hover an inch or two from the glass, as if to say: “Where the hell is it?”

At this point the hummingbirds may be bulking-up for their fall migration. My flock probably will self-deport to Mexico. But they’ll be back in the spring.

Posted in Idle Ruminations, Life in New Mexico | Comments Off on Feeding the hummingbirds