A reluctant athlete

I joined a new gym this week, and worked out there for the first time today. It passed my test: fairly clean, uncrowded and five minutes from home. There’s no juice bar, personal trainers or pulsating music and that’s fine with me. Most important, TV hookups on each machine enable me to plug in my earphones for a session of cardio and cable news.

I’m not what you’d call a gym rat and certainly am no athlete. In school I was the kid with glasses who was the last to be picked for the team. But I concluded years ago that exercise is my last defense against age and gravity, and enables me to enjoy great food without feeling guilty.

So hitting the gym and the bicycle trail several times a week is part of my lifestyle. I enjoy bicycling, but working out at the gym is something I feel obligated to do because it’s good for me, like flossing. Some people claim vigorous exercise makes them feel euphoric. I have never experienced this and feel good when I stop exercising.

I credit the Navy with getting me into the fitness habit. Every year I was required to pass a physical fitness test that included pushups, sit-ups and running. That forced me to visit the gym regularly to stay in shape.

After I retired from the reserves I was not about to do pushups, sit-ups and running voluntarily. So I signed up for aerobics classes at the local YMCA. That worked for me because classes do not require motivation or discipline beyond showing up.

Most of the aerobics instructors were terminally perky young women who would shout inane encouragements like: “How do you feel?” I would shout back: “Old!” Another favorite was: “Listen to your body!” My body kept telling me to stop jumping around and have a beer. I developed a tolerance for bad music, learned to wear earplugs when they cranked up the volume and would pop a Mozart tape into the player when I got back to my car.

The gym is a great place to people-watch, especially if you frequent low-budget clubs as I do. In Chicago I went to a chain health club on the edge of the city that attracted a multicultural crowd. English was the third most popular language and there were a lot of tough-looking characters with exotic tattoos. The men, too.

The fitness chain always had a big Christmas sale to attract new members and I learned to avoid the place right after New Year’s. The parking lot was full, the locker room was nastier than usual and the first few aerobics classes were a sweaty demolition derby of random flailing limbs. Happily, the New Year’s resolution crowd thinned out after a couple of weeks.

That health club was close to Sam’s Club, and it was convenient to stop there on my way home. Grocery shopping after a workout is a bad idea, especially at Sam’s Club. 20 pounds of ribs! A cubic yard of Cheetos!

I no longer attend classes because the step aerobics I used to do has fallen out of fashion, but the habit of regular exercise has become ingrained. My retired-military status enables me to use the fitness center at an Air Force base in Albuquerque. It’s a 20-minute drive, but I can shop at the exchange, pick up prescriptions, etc. while I’m there. The facility is well equipped, scrupulously clean, free of charge and includes such perks as a senior officers’ locker room. I wear a Navy t-shirt to maintain my identity.

The Air Force fitness center remains my workout of choice, but the neighborhood gym will keep me active on those days when it’s too cold to bicycle and I don’t feel like driving across town. I can’t say I’m looking forward to going there, but it will feel good to get my workout over with close to home.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | 2 Comments

Do we need a Secretary of Information Technology?

So the new health insurances exchanges for Obamacare have been plagued by computer problems. Is anybody surprised? Government agencies are not good at running consumer-oriented computer systems. When the feds take on a project as big as Obamacare we tend to assume they’ll screw it up.

It’s not just the federal government. State governments have chronic problems with computer systems that handle unemployment benefits and other government functions. Some states have invested millions of tax dollars in information technology that is outdated, inadequate or just plain doesn’t work.

Happily, this does not seem to be a problem for military technology. Fighter jets fly by wire, cruise missiles find their targets and drones kill terrorists. I’m a little skeptical of the National Security Agency’s data collection, but if Amazon and Facebook can deliver personalized ads I’d like my government to be just as smart at finding the bad guys and keeping us safe.

Most of us have grown accustomed to using computer systems and expect a seamless experience when we bank, pay bills and make airline reservations online. I am comfortable managing my life this way and trust that my bank, Amazon and other commercial websites will process my transactions flawlessly.

I don’t have the same level of trust in government websites, which often are balky and not particularly user-friendly. When I pay my state taxes online I am never completely confident that my payment is going through. The Veterans Administration website allows me to manage my health records online but did not have a record of my knee surgery last year.

One of the reasons private companies are good at online commerce is that they treat information technology as a strategic function under the direction of a chief information officer. I don’t see that level of emphasis in government, where information systems are a support function and often fragmented among government agencies.

So I wonder if federal and state governments would do a better job of managing information technology if they upgraded the IT function under a cabinet-level chief information officer. Not your average political appointee, of course, but a seasoned tech exec from someplace like American Express or Amazon. The risk is that a government IT organization could become an entrenched, unaccountable bureaucracy like the Internal Revenue Service or, for that matter, some corporate IT departments.

Housebreaking government information technology is critical because the core political issue today is the size and scope of government. It will be ironic if the Obamacare exchanges, signature achievement of the big-government folks, become an inadvertent recruiting tool for the Libertarians.

Posted in Commentary | Comments Off on Do we need a Secretary of Information Technology?

A bite of the Big Apple

I renewed my love/hate relationship with New York City last weekend when I flew in for a two-day nonprofit board meeting. Even though I spent about as much time on American Airlines’ flying cattle cars as in the meeting, I enjoyed getting back to the Big Apple.

I’m familiar with the city because my corporate career brought me there on business several times a year through the 1970s and 80s. I learned to navigate the subway system and enjoyed prowling around Manhattan. It’s a great place to visit on an expense account.

Arriving in New York would be exciting if I could be teleported directly to, say, Fifth Avenue. Instead, I’m greeted by a scruffy LaGuardia airport and a cab ride through crumbling neighborhoods in gridlock traffic as the meter burns through my wallet.  New York’s quaint custom of piling garbage bags into Les Miz sidewalk barricades adds to the overall impression of a city strangling itself. The construction scaffolds obstructing traffic on virtually every block prompt me to wonder what New York will be like if they ever finish renovating it.

I see New York through the lens of a passionate city kid. I grew up in an apartment in Chicago, took the subway to college and worked in the Loop for most of my career. I get back there regularly to see friends and family, get a Michigan Avenue fix and go through my checklist of ethnic restaurants – even though the traffic and weather remind me why I retired to Albuquerque.

Working in a big city means that you play in the major leagues and can compete with anybody. I felt this in Chicago, and even more so when I went to New York on business.

New York is a city on steroids in which both the good and bad aspects of urban life are carried to extremes. Yes, traffic is impossible and much of the place is a mess. But there’s more to do, see and eat than practically anyplace. Last weekend’s visit included a great dinner in an old-school Italian restaurant and a pint in an older-school Irish pub with actual Irish servers. A deli near my hotel had sandwiches, panini, Mexican food, Asian food and pizza.

The pulse of street life never stops, so much so that on my first few visits I was reluctant to go back to my hotel room at night for fear that I’d miss something exciting. The urban-anthill press of humanity makes New York a people-watchers paradise and agoraphobe’s nightmare.

I don’t see how anyone can feel self-conscious on the streets of New York. No matter what you do or wear, you probably will not be the most bizarre person within view and passersby won’t bat an eyelash. On one visit to New York a guy walked up to me on the street and screamed incoherently. I screamed back and it felt good.

Times Square is bigger, brighter and more crowded than ever, but when I visited a few summers ago it had been taken over by tourists. Everybody in Times Square appeared to be visiting from either Iowa or China. They were snapping pictures of the buildings, their friends, the cops, their friends with the cops. The place had more character when it was dominated by pimps and hookers in the 70s.

New York is a wonderful place to live if you’re wealthy. A corporate executive and his wife, friends of my parents, moved there in the 70s and loved the city. They lived in a fashionable apartment, did all the cultural stuff, went to restaurants where the maître d’ recognized them and never once rode the subway. For the rest of us, moving to New York to expand your horizons requires downsizing your lifestyle. Most of the people I’ve visited in New York live in apartments the size of my family room.

I really enjoy visiting New York and certainly can appreciate why people live there. But I was happy to get back to Albuquerque Sunday night.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | Comments Off on A bite of the Big Apple

Cutting the cord

I finally cancelled my landline telephone service. My local phone service has been deteriorating and the cable company made me an offer I couldn’t refuse. This is a big step for me because I was a phone company guy for more than half my career.

I’m still amazed by the technology that transformed an industry and ultimately made it obsolete. When I joined Illinois Bell in 1968, AT&T and its Bell telephone companies made up the largest enterprise in the world: more than a million people, tens of thousands of equipment buildings and millions of miles of cable dedicated mostly to voice telephone service.

That massive investment has all but evaporated. Voice telephone service now is a software function on a generic Internet router, just another data stream on the Internet or a wireless cellular system, and can no longer survive as a standalone business.

My career gave me a front-row seat to this transformation. The Bell System was a monopoly because the staggering capital investment needed to provide telephone service made competition impractical. It was heavily regulated, capably managed by engineers and former Eagle Scouts, and had fiercely loyal employees who racked up decades of perfect attendance. AT&T was a rock-solid business that delivered bulletproof dividends to widow-and-orphan stockholders.

Ironically, it was technology (mostly developed by Bell Laboratories) that made it economical for competitors to meet growing demand for long-distance data communications. This ultimately forced the breakup of the Bell System and fed a generation of lawyers.

Long distance service was the Bell System’s cash cow, and opening it to competition spawned giant companies (remember Worldcom?). But advancing technology eclipsed these companies when long distance service became so cheap that cell phone companies began giving it away.

Meanwhile, state regulators created pretend competition for local phone service by forcing telephone companies to sell their service below cost to fly-by-night resellers who would offer more choices to consumers. Consumers, for the most part, didn’t buy it.

Technology has done what government could not: create a truly competitive telecommunications marketplace. My local telephone and cable companies compete head-to-head with low-priced package deals on telephone service, Internet broadband and television. Today’s cash cow is television delivery, and that may disappear as Internet TV services like Hulu bypass cable and satellite TV companies. And more consumers are replacing landline service with cell phones.

Since government regulation was originally intended as a substitute for competition, today’s marketplace is making government agencies redundant and bureaucrats unhappy. With no monopolies left to dismember, the Department of Justice antitrust division is reduced to blocking mergers and the Federal Communications Commission is proposing to regulate the Internet.

Meanwhile, I’m enjoying my new digital phone service. Eventually I may take the next step and switch to all-cellular service, but I’ve grown accustomed to having a phone in practically every room. Perhaps I’m still a phone company guy.

Posted in Commentary | Comments Off on Cutting the cord

It’s time for civil rights 2.0

My heart goes out to the parents of Trayvon Martin. But I’m getting tired of being called a racist.

I came of age during the civil rights movement in the 1960s and raised my kids in a racially mixed suburb. During my career I watched affirmative action and diversity programs succeed in every company and institution I encountered.

I’ve seen public attitudes on race relations change dramatically in a single generation. Yes, racism still exists, but today there’s an overwhelming consensus that racism is wrong. Minorities are protected by law in a variety of ways and countless billions of tax dollars have been spent on anti-poverty programs.

The civil rights movement deserves credit for this initiative. But it’s worth noting that this massive, half-century commitment has been carried out by a succession of mostly white leaders with the support of an overwhelming majority of Americans. It’s a shining example of American exceptionalism: No other country in the world has done so much to raise up a minority population with the backing of the entire nation.

That’s why it’s dismaying to see the hysterical reaction to the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman case, and to the Supreme Court decision to end federal supervision of Southern state voting laws. Civil rights leaders, the news media and politicians would have us believe that nothing has changed since the 1960s: that African-Americans are still under attack from white racists, and that American laws and justice are insufficient to address the concerns of African-Americans.

  • Civil rights advocates and the media convicted George Zimmerman of a hate crime well before his trial, and that narrative persists despite a fair trial and exculpatory verdict. Does the right to self-defense really threaten every black child in America? At what point does a civil rights protest become a lynch mob?
  • What’s revealing about Trayvon-mania is the extent of black grievance and white guilt: that so many people believed a made-up story despite evidence to the contrary, and were outraged when the trial disproved that story. Why did these folks want Martin and Zimmerman to be Emmett Till and Bull Connors instead of two ordinary guys who made bad decisions? 
  • The Supreme Court ruling left the rest of the Voting Rights Act intact and recognized that black voter registration now equals or exceeds that of whites. That means the 1964 law has been a spectacular success. Yet civil rights leaders and their politicians chose to claim defeat with wild-eyed claims that Jim Crow laws are coming back (which would be a surprise to the numerous black elected officials in the South).

What’s ominous is that this dramatic increase in race-baiting has the tacit approval of our first African-American president. I understand that President Obama needs to shore up his political base. But putting a civil-rights label on the unrelated issues of gun control, stand-your-ground laws and attempts to curb voter fraud is dividing the country. Not to mention the impulse of Democratic politicians to label legitimate criticism of the President’s policies as racist.

The President says we need an honest conversation about race relations and I could not agree more. But it needs to be a conversation for 2013 and not 1965.

  • We need to acknowledge that African-American men commit more crimes than any other group, and that their profiling has as much to do with common sense as with racism. Let’s explore the factors that contribute to this such as education, popular culture and community institutions.
  • We need to admit that government programs to combat poverty often have resulted in dependence rather than progress, and seek new ideas rather than pour good money after bad.
  • Since jobs and education are part of the problem, we need to ask why African-American politicians and groups like the NAACP exclude employers like Walmart from our cities, oppose educational reform by supporting teachers’ unions, and kill entry-level jobs with a higher minimum wage.
  • We need to ask why African-Americans follow leaders who promote a sense of grievance and dismiss people like Herman Cain and Allen West. Why are rap artists who spew racism and misogyny invited to the White House? And why have the news media anointed Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton as the spokesmen for all African-Americans? Isn’t it time for those guys to retire?
  • Most important, can we really have a conversation about these issues without being accused of racism for raising them?

America has done a lot to end racism and inequality through government action. Much of this effort has been successful, but reviving the civil rights protests of the 1960s will not solve the significant problems that remain. To deny the progress of the last 50 years and claim that all the problems of today’s African-Americans are the result of white racism is dishonest and offensive.

It’s time for a new approach to make African-Americans truly equal, and it’s up to blacks to lead the way – probably with new leaders. I’m certain that legitimate efforts to advance economic and educational opportunities for minorities will win the support of all Americans because that’s the kind of nation we are. But accusing most of the population of racism will not help.

 

Posted in Commentary | Comments Off on It’s time for civil rights 2.0

SHOUTING BETWEEN SHIPS IN ALL CAPS

The news that the Navy has abandoned its tradition of typing messages in all capital letters reminded me of the quirky communications I experienced in my seagoing days.

The all-caps format had its origins in the limitations of teletype technology. Now that Navy ships and aircraft are connected by high-speed data networks and secure voice circuits, modernizing the message format certainly makes sense. That would have been impossible when I went to sea in 1966.

My ship received its message traffic via World War II technology, with a radioman listening to Morse code and typing the letters on a typewriter. Classified messages, in the form of groups of letters, had to be decoded using a crypto machine. As the communications officer, I spent long hours typing code groups into the machine and assembling strips of paper into the finished message. In all-caps, of course.

Communication between ships has always been limited by technology and the need for security. For centuries, navies have used a series of signal flags hoisted on a halyard to spell words or use a shorthand vocabulary of frequently used phrases. In officers’ training my classmates and I amused ourselves by combining standard flaghoist phrases into nonsense messages such as “submerge to periscope depth and air bedding.”

It’s hard to be eloquent when communicating with signal flags. At the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805, Horatio Nelson wanted to inspire the fleet with the message: England confides that every man will do his duty. His signals officer reminded the admiral that “confides” was not in the standard flaghoist vocabulary and would have to be spelled out letter by letter. The resulting word substitution went down in history as: England expects that every man will do his duty. It required 31 flags.

Tactical communication was a little like the forced abbreviation of today’s text messages and Twitter. The Navy probably does not have a flaghoist for LOL or OMG, though enterprising sailors may have invented something on their own.

Voice radio for short-range communications presented the same challenge because transmitting in code entailed reading multi-letter code groups into the microphone. It was easier to use the standard vocabulary in the codebook than to spell words one letter at a time.

One morning our ship was proceeding to a rendezvous with the mother ship for our patrol zone. Along the way we responded to frequent coded voice radio messages asking: What is your position? Finally we arrived and, as we moored alongside the mother ship, received yet another what is your position? query. Using standard codebook vocabulary, we replied: Look out starboard porthole.

We communicated with nearby ships using Morse code on a signal searchlight. That generally worked, though we were unable to converse intelligibly with a Russian trawler that shadowed us briefly. We occasionally encountered a South Vietnamese patrol ship that was technically an ally but not good at communicating. One day the Vietnamese ship flashed the standard challenge of A-A (what ship?). We made the customary response, our four-letter callsign, but got a second challenge. We replied with our ship’s hull number. The Vietnamese ship queried: What is your name? By this time our signalman was out of patience. Instead of laboriously spelling out USS Woodpecker in Morse code, he flashed: My name is Jim. What’s yours? 

 

Posted in Sea Stories | Comments Off on SHOUTING BETWEEN SHIPS IN ALL CAPS

Adventures of a Pentagon warrior

My career in the Navy probably included more time at the Pentagon than at sea. The Pentagon, legendary nerve center of the world’s largest military establishment, is known by such nicknames as the “puzzle palace.”

As a reserve public affairs officer in the 1970s and 80s, I went to the Pentagon for my annual active duty every third or fourth year because that’s where public affairs officers are needed – and where they go if they wish to advance.

The Pentagon is the world’s largest office building with more than 6 million square feet and 30,000 people. It’s practically a self-contained city with a shopping mall, bus terminal and subway station. The building dominates the landscape, though I once encountered a Washington cab driver who was unable to find it.

The Pentagon is a typically functional, no-frills government office building. Its unique architecture is confusing at first but there’s a system to it: Five sides, five floors, five concentric “rings” separated by air shafts. It’s easy to figure out that Room 2B315 is on the second floor of the B ring, and the best way to get there is to take Corridor 3 across the radius of the building instead of walking around the B ring.

The first time I worked in the Pentagon I came across an exterior wall at one end of the building, and looked out the window to see a pipe discharging viscous matter into a dumpster. This was where classified documents were shredded and converted to pulp, I was told. Aha, the output of the building! I figured there was a loading dock at the other end where paper was delivered.

Even though it’s a military headquarters, the Pentagon is not particularly warlike. Many of the people there are civilian employees. If you see people engaged in intense conversation in the cafeteria they probably are talking about their pensions and not about nuking the bad guys.

It’s more egalitarian than a military base, perhaps because there are so many high-ranking officers that the customary perks of rank are impractical. Nobody salutes inside the building and everybody works in a spartan office or cubicle. Generals and admirals probably have a private lunchroom somewhere, but everybody else stands in line at the cafeteria. The relatively modest trappings must be disappointing for senior officers who are treated as deities on the average military base.

I wound up parking in a Pentagon lot so distant it may have been in another state. As I trudged across the acres of North Parking I could feel my white summer uniform wilting in the Washington humidity. By the time I reached the building, I looked like a Good Humor Man who’d been mugged. I was particularly demoralized one morning when I encountered a group of Marines in exercise gear who were running around the building. Only three more laps, guys!

Even though the Pentagon is considered a temple of bureaucracy, the organizations where I worked were very efficient, sometimes more so than my corporation in Chicago. As a staff organization, the Navy Office of Information had relatively few layers of management with ready access to our admiral.

Getting the approval of other organizations entailed a process known as “chopping” (a slang term that may have had its origins in ancient China). We would attach a cover sheet to the document listing the organizations whose approval we needed. Then I’d walk the document to each office to get their “chop,” usually from an officer on duty who was authorized to sign off for his group. This required some shoe leather, but I once got approval on a letter for the Secretary of the Navy in a day. Today they probably do this even faster by email.

An open-air courtyard at the center of the building is an inviting park with trees, grass, food stands and occasional band concerts. At lunchtime my colleagues and I would eat hot dogs and make idle wagers about the number of Soviet missiles targeted on our particular park bench.

In one tour of reserve duty I worked on a special project in a makeshift task force office on the lower level of the building. The windowless office was crowded and I sat next to a commander who recently had been the skipper of a nuclear missile submarine. At lunch one day, I asked him how it felt to go from the prestige of commanding a capital ship to being an ordinary working stiff in the Pentagon. “It’s certainly a drop in status,” he said. “But I get to go home at night.”

 

Posted in Sea Stories | Comments Off on Adventures of a Pentagon warrior

Being an author

I’ve been writing for money since I was 19 but officially became an author last year when my neighbor and I published a book. Always thought it would be cool to be an author… I smoke a pipe and everything.

Don Jose, An American Soldier’s Courage and Faith in Japanese Captivity, is the story of a local World War II veteran who survived Japanese POW camps. You can read more about the book on our website.

Writing the book was the easy part. My co-author and I were blissfully unaware that somewhere between 600,000 and 1 million books are published each year in the U.S., thanks to the explosion of self-publishing and e-books. Most nonfiction books sell fewer than 250 copies a year and have about a one percent chance of getting space on bookstore shelves.

We soon learned that our publisher, a small publishing house in Santa Fe, could get the book online at Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble but was unable to get it into bookstores. So, like most authors, we’ve done our own marketing. We’ve done book signings in every bookstore in town, promoted the book on local radio stations and sent an email to every public library in New Mexico. I got publicity in an alumni magazine and my Navy group’s newsletter. My co-author sold a copy to every member of the Knights of Columbus.

We have had some success selling books in the lobby of the exchange store at the local Air Force base, and one local bookstore has been very supportive in stocking the book and hosting book signings. We sold very few books at the veterans’ hospital, though we had some interesting conversations with a couple of guys from the psych ward. We did very well at a convention of descendants of Bataan-Corregidor veterans and at a Filipino-American National Historical Society convention.

Crowd control at the book fiesta

Recently we participated in the first Southwest Book Fiesta at the Albuquerque Convention Center. The event was a spectacular failure, so poorly attended that we thought they’d dropped the neutron bomb. Everybody except the promoters lost money, especially the authors who traveled from outside the area. We had a good time hanging out with other authors and publishers, though.

My co-author is good at the meeting-and-greeting thing and I’m getting better at it. We may have a future as greeters at Walmart. Sometimes we sell more than a dozen books in an afternoon and that makes us feel prosperous – until we subtract the cost of the books and other expenses and find that we’re working for less than minimum wage.

We’ve learned that some kinds of books sell better than others. Cookbooks sell in New Mexico, along with anything about Georgia O’Keefe. Veteran biographies not so much, though the Navajo Code Talkers are big. Every time we have a book signing someone asks if our guy was a Code Talker and is disappointed when we explain that Don Jose was Hispanic. If we had written a book about a war hero who was a Native American artist they’d be all over it in Santa Fe.

Still, our book has done well in its category. Unlike many veteran memoirs and biographies, our story is well documented and fact-checked. We’ve had some good reviews and recently won first prize for biography in the New Mexico Press Women’s annual competition.

One of the experts at the Book Fiesta told me that a book can be considered a best seller if it’s sold more than 500 copies. By that standard we’ve beaten the odds, though our publisher will not give us a straight answer on total sales. We’ve sold a couple of hundred copies online and in bookstores, but most of our sales have been in person, one copy at a time. We’re pleased with ourselves but grateful we don’t have to do this for a living.

My co-author and I sometimes talk about writing another book. I’m thinking about it.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | Comments Off on Being an author

Cinco de Mayo on the Old Town Plaza

I spent a pleasant Cinco de Mayo afternoon pretending to sell books on Albuquerque’s Old Town Plaza.

The plaza, traditional center of every Hispanic town, is one of my favorite places. For those of you in Anglo territory, picture a town square in adobe anchored by a church instead of a courthouse. Santa Fe has a famous plaza flanked by the 400-year-old Governor’s Palace and an array of upscale restaurants, galleries and shops.

Albuquerque’s plaza is more intimate and interesting. If you look past the storefronts, you can see that most of the buildings were originally family homes. The massive wooden doors and adobe walls show enough genteel decay to remind you that the place is 300 years old.

The Old Town Plaza is touristy, with the obligatory tacky souvenirs and average Mexican restaurants, but it’s also a place of secret treasures. The shops and galleries are tiny and distinctive. We’ve done several book signings at a bookstore on the plaza that supports local authors. Courtyards off the main plaza conceal clusters of shops around quiet patios.

My co-author knows a guy who runs a cafe in one of the courtyards, and we occasionally are invited to sell our book from a table on the patio. The Patio Market is its own distinct village with a couple of galleries, a yarn shop, a jewelry repairman, a boutique and the cafe facing a patio with a fountain. It’s beautifully landscaped, thanks to the wife of one of the gallery owners.

Because most shoppers stumble across the courtyard by accident, the cafe guy brings in live music on weekends to make the place more of an attraction. My co-author and I are part of his promotion scheme, though we probably are not enough of an attraction to offset the free sandwiches and coffee we get.

Old Town, inexplicably, had no major Cinco de Mayo celebration on the plaza: nothing like the Elvis festival they had a few weeks ago. The main focus of Cinco de Mayo in Albuquerque is stepped-up police DWI checkpoints on Saturday night. In the Patio Market, the matronly singer who usually strums a guitar was amplified by a Mexican karaoke group. Wish I could understand Spanish: I suspect some of the lyrics she was belting out were bawdy.

It’s a better venue for people watching than book selling. The courtyard gets a steady trickle of visitors, mostly tourists with the occasional local character. Those who are not using the market as a shortcut to the parking lot stop and listen to the music, and a few listen to my elevator pitch for the book. The most popular activity is taking pictures: of friends, family members, the courtyard and especially the flowers.

Sometimes we sell a couple of books outside the cafe, sometimes not. I didn’t sell any on this Cinco de Mayo but had a delightful afternoon anyway.

Posted in Idle Ruminations, Life in New Mexico | Comments Off on Cinco de Mayo on the Old Town Plaza

Theocracy and marshmallow Peeps

I spent Easter listening to Handel’s Messiah, eating marshmallow Peeps and watching the world celebrate the Resurrection (except for the folks at Google who resurrected Cesar Chavez instead). I wound up scratching my head about the way religion keeps popping up in public issues.

We pride ourselves on religious tolerance in the United States but I’m not sure it’s really in our DNA. The early colonists fled England to avoid religious persecution, but set up little theocracies as soon as they landed and started burning witches.

Meanwhile, the Spanish were propagating the faith in the Southwest. Hi there, Indians! You’re all Catholic now because we have guns. 

We have Thomas Jefferson to thank for the inclusion of freedom of religion in the First Amendment and the concept of “a wall of separation” between church and state. Whether Americans embrace that principle today is anybody’s guess. Rick Santorum never got the memo.

The latest church-state issue is same-sex marriage. I’ve supported same-sex marriage for decades but can’t help wondering: If we’re serious about the separation of church and state, why do we let the government perform marriages?

All the state should care about is a legal contract that confers spousal rights. The moment we call that contract a marriage, people think the state is their church and try to impose their religious beliefs on everyone. Outsourcing the sacrament of marriage to the government makes it a civil right, and that’s the conflict.

This would be a non-issue if the state issued a spousal contract and left it at that. Any two people (perhaps more in Utah) could register at City Hall and then get married, or not, in the church of their choice. Churches would be in charge of marriage and could deny their sacrament to anyone they choose. The divorce lawyers would get even more business.

If the churches backed such a proposal I’ll bet most state legislatures would quickly approve it. Unless, of course, church people really don’t want to separate church and state and would rather impose their beliefs on everyone through government force.

Theocracy has been part of political debate since the evangelical folks hijacked the Republican Party several decades ago. I’ve always found it odd that Republicans stand for economic freedom but some of them want to impose a kind of Christian Sharia law on personal freedom. The Democrats wisely exploited social issues in the last election to divert attention from their dismal economic record.

What’s more puzzling is the growing antipathy toward religion: a sort of reverse theocracy. Atheists have been filing frivolous lawsuits for years but now are being taken seriously: a few municipal governments and school districts have gone to ridiculous lengths to banish any mention of Christmas or Easter from holiday celebrations in a kind of atheist Sharia law. How can so few atheists — about 5 percent of the population — afford so many lawyers? Perhaps they tithe. As a lapsed Unitarian, I’m practically an atheist myself but do not feel at all insulted that “In God We Trust” is printed on our money.

Fox News tut-tuts about a war on religion and may have a point. An increasingly non-religious population re-elected a government that forces Catholic institutions to provide free birth control and is unconcerned about the Arab Spring’s open season on Christians.

Time magazine has declared that the same-sex marriage debate is over and religious objections are irrelevant. Even the news media coverage of the new Pope was a little snarky at times. A few commentators sounded disappointed that the cardinals elected a Catholic. And one of the most popular musicals on Broadway makes fun of Mormons.

It’s ironic that nobody dares ridicule the Muslims, some of whom want to impose Sharia law for real. That’s probably because radical Islamists kill people when their feelings are hurt. I guess it’s prudent, but a little cowardly, to disparage only those religions that turn the other cheek.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. It’s refreshing to see the evangelical theocrats in retreat but stamping out religion, as the Communists tried to do, is no improvement. So far, Handel’s Messiah appears to be safe and nobody is messing with my marshmallow Peeps.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | 2 Comments