Adventures of a Pentagon warrior

My career in the Navy probably included more time at the Pentagon than at sea. The Pentagon, legendary nerve center of the world’s largest military establishment, is known by such nicknames as the “puzzle palace.”

As a reserve public affairs officer in the 1970s and 80s, I went to the Pentagon for my annual active duty every third or fourth year because that’s where public affairs officers are needed – and where they go if they wish to advance.

The Pentagon is the world’s largest office building with more than 6 million square feet and 30,000 people. It’s practically a self-contained city with a shopping mall, bus terminal and subway station. The building dominates the landscape, though I once encountered a Washington cab driver who was unable to find it.

The Pentagon is a typically functional, no-frills government office building. Its unique architecture is confusing at first but there’s a system to it: Five sides, five floors, five concentric “rings” separated by air shafts. It’s easy to figure out that Room 2B315 is on the second floor of the B ring, and the best way to get there is to take Corridor 3 across the radius of the building instead of walking around the B ring.

The first time I worked in the Pentagon I came across an exterior wall at one end of the building, and looked out the window to see a pipe discharging viscous matter into a dumpster. This was where classified documents were shredded and converted to pulp, I was told. Aha, the output of the building! I figured there was a loading dock at the other end where paper was delivered.

Even though it’s a military headquarters, the Pentagon is not particularly warlike. Many of the people there are civilian employees. If you see people engaged in intense conversation in the cafeteria they probably are talking about their pensions and not about nuking the bad guys.

It’s more egalitarian than a military base, perhaps because there are so many high-ranking officers that the customary perks of rank are impractical. Nobody salutes inside the building and everybody works in a spartan office or cubicle. Generals and admirals probably have a private lunchroom somewhere, but everybody else stands in line at the cafeteria. The relatively modest trappings must be disappointing for senior officers who are treated as deities on the average military base.

I wound up parking in a Pentagon lot so distant it may have been in another state. As I trudged across the acres of North Parking I could feel my white summer uniform wilting in the Washington humidity. By the time I reached the building, I looked like a Good Humor Man who’d been mugged. I was particularly demoralized one morning when I encountered a group of Marines in exercise gear who were running around the building. Only three more laps, guys!

Even though the Pentagon is considered a temple of bureaucracy, the organizations where I worked were very efficient, sometimes more so than my corporation in Chicago. As a staff organization, the Navy Office of Information had relatively few layers of management with ready access to our admiral.

Getting the approval of other organizations entailed a process known as “chopping” (a slang term that may have had its origins in ancient China). We would attach a cover sheet to the document listing the organizations whose approval we needed. Then I’d walk the document to each office to get their “chop,” usually from an officer on duty who was authorized to sign off for his group. This required some shoe leather, but I once got approval on a letter for the Secretary of the Navy in a day. Today they probably do this even faster by email.

An open-air courtyard at the center of the building is an inviting park with trees, grass, food stands and occasional band concerts. At lunchtime my colleagues and I would eat hot dogs and make idle wagers about the number of Soviet missiles targeted on our particular park bench.

In one tour of reserve duty I worked on a special project in a makeshift task force office on the lower level of the building. The windowless office was crowded and I sat next to a commander who recently had been the skipper of a nuclear missile submarine. At lunch one day, I asked him how it felt to go from the prestige of commanding a capital ship to being an ordinary working stiff in the Pentagon. “It’s certainly a drop in status,” he said. “But I get to go home at night.”

 

Posted in Sea Stories | Comments Off on Adventures of a Pentagon warrior

Being an author

I’ve been writing for money since I was 19 but officially became an author last year when my neighbor and I published a book. Always thought it would be cool to be an author… I smoke a pipe and everything.

Don Jose, An American Soldier’s Courage and Faith in Japanese Captivity, is the story of a local World War II veteran who survived Japanese POW camps. You can read more about the book on our website.

Writing the book was the easy part. My co-author and I were blissfully unaware that somewhere between 600,000 and 1 million books are published each year in the U.S., thanks to the explosion of self-publishing and e-books. Most nonfiction books sell fewer than 250 copies a year and have about a one percent chance of getting space on bookstore shelves.

We soon learned that our publisher, a small publishing house in Santa Fe, could get the book online at Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble but was unable to get it into bookstores. So, like most authors, we’ve done our own marketing. We’ve done book signings in every bookstore in town, promoted the book on local radio stations and sent an email to every public library in New Mexico. I got publicity in an alumni magazine and my Navy group’s newsletter. My co-author sold a copy to every member of the Knights of Columbus.

We have had some success selling books in the lobby of the exchange store at the local Air Force base, and one local bookstore has been very supportive in stocking the book and hosting book signings. We sold very few books at the veterans’ hospital, though we had some interesting conversations with a couple of guys from the psych ward. We did very well at a convention of descendants of Bataan-Corregidor veterans and at a Filipino-American National Historical Society convention.

Crowd control at the book fiesta

Recently we participated in the first Southwest Book Fiesta at the Albuquerque Convention Center. The event was a spectacular failure, so poorly attended that we thought they’d dropped the neutron bomb. Everybody except the promoters lost money, especially the authors who traveled from outside the area. We had a good time hanging out with other authors and publishers, though.

My co-author is good at the meeting-and-greeting thing and I’m getting better at it. We may have a future as greeters at Walmart. Sometimes we sell more than a dozen books in an afternoon and that makes us feel prosperous – until we subtract the cost of the books and other expenses and find that we’re working for less than minimum wage.

We’ve learned that some kinds of books sell better than others. Cookbooks sell in New Mexico, along with anything about Georgia O’Keefe. Veteran biographies not so much, though the Navajo Code Talkers are big. Every time we have a book signing someone asks if our guy was a Code Talker and is disappointed when we explain that Don Jose was Hispanic. If we had written a book about a war hero who was a Native American artist they’d be all over it in Santa Fe.

Still, our book has done well in its category. Unlike many veteran memoirs and biographies, our story is well documented and fact-checked. We’ve had some good reviews and recently won first prize for biography in the New Mexico Press Women’s annual competition.

One of the experts at the Book Fiesta told me that a book can be considered a best seller if it’s sold more than 500 copies. By that standard we’ve beaten the odds, though our publisher will not give us a straight answer on total sales. We’ve sold a couple of hundred copies online and in bookstores, but most of our sales have been in person, one copy at a time. We’re pleased with ourselves but grateful we don’t have to do this for a living.

My co-author and I sometimes talk about writing another book. I’m thinking about it.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | Comments Off on Being an author

Cinco de Mayo on the Old Town Plaza

I spent a pleasant Cinco de Mayo afternoon pretending to sell books on Albuquerque’s Old Town Plaza.

The plaza, traditional center of every Hispanic town, is one of my favorite places. For those of you in Anglo territory, picture a town square in adobe anchored by a church instead of a courthouse. Santa Fe has a famous plaza flanked by the 400-year-old Governor’s Palace and an array of upscale restaurants, galleries and shops.

Albuquerque’s plaza is more intimate and interesting. If you look past the storefronts, you can see that most of the buildings were originally family homes. The massive wooden doors and adobe walls show enough genteel decay to remind you that the place is 300 years old.

The Old Town Plaza is touristy, with the obligatory tacky souvenirs and average Mexican restaurants, but it’s also a place of secret treasures. The shops and galleries are tiny and distinctive. We’ve done several book signings at a bookstore on the plaza that supports local authors. Courtyards off the main plaza conceal clusters of shops around quiet patios.

My co-author knows a guy who runs a cafe in one of the courtyards, and we occasionally are invited to sell our book from a table on the patio. The Patio Market is its own distinct village with a couple of galleries, a yarn shop, a jewelry repairman, a boutique and the cafe facing a patio with a fountain. It’s beautifully landscaped, thanks to the wife of one of the gallery owners.

Because most shoppers stumble across the courtyard by accident, the cafe guy brings in live music on weekends to make the place more of an attraction. My co-author and I are part of his promotion scheme, though we probably are not enough of an attraction to offset the free sandwiches and coffee we get.

Old Town, inexplicably, had no major Cinco de Mayo celebration on the plaza: nothing like the Elvis festival they had a few weeks ago. The main focus of Cinco de Mayo in Albuquerque is stepped-up police DWI checkpoints on Saturday night. In the Patio Market, the matronly singer who usually strums a guitar was amplified by a Mexican karaoke group. Wish I could understand Spanish: I suspect some of the lyrics she was belting out were bawdy.

It’s a better venue for people watching than book selling. The courtyard gets a steady trickle of visitors, mostly tourists with the occasional local character. Those who are not using the market as a shortcut to the parking lot stop and listen to the music, and a few listen to my elevator pitch for the book. The most popular activity is taking pictures: of friends, family members, the courtyard and especially the flowers.

Sometimes we sell a couple of books outside the cafe, sometimes not. I didn’t sell any on this Cinco de Mayo but had a delightful afternoon anyway.

Posted in Idle Ruminations, Life in New Mexico | Comments Off on Cinco de Mayo on the Old Town Plaza

Theocracy and marshmallow Peeps

I spent Easter listening to Handel’s Messiah, eating marshmallow Peeps and watching the world celebrate the Resurrection (except for the folks at Google who resurrected Cesar Chavez instead). I wound up scratching my head about the way religion keeps popping up in public issues.

We pride ourselves on religious tolerance in the United States but I’m not sure it’s really in our DNA. The early colonists fled England to avoid religious persecution, but set up little theocracies as soon as they landed and started burning witches.

Meanwhile, the Spanish were propagating the faith in the Southwest. Hi there, Indians! You’re all Catholic now because we have guns. 

We have Thomas Jefferson to thank for the inclusion of freedom of religion in the First Amendment and the concept of “a wall of separation” between church and state. Whether Americans embrace that principle today is anybody’s guess. Rick Santorum never got the memo.

The latest church-state issue is same-sex marriage. I’ve supported same-sex marriage for decades but can’t help wondering: If we’re serious about the separation of church and state, why do we let the government perform marriages?

All the state should care about is a legal contract that confers spousal rights. The moment we call that contract a marriage, people think the state is their church and try to impose their religious beliefs on everyone. Outsourcing the sacrament of marriage to the government makes it a civil right, and that’s the conflict.

This would be a non-issue if the state issued a spousal contract and left it at that. Any two people (perhaps more in Utah) could register at City Hall and then get married, or not, in the church of their choice. Churches would be in charge of marriage and could deny their sacrament to anyone they choose. The divorce lawyers would get even more business.

If the churches backed such a proposal I’ll bet most state legislatures would quickly approve it. Unless, of course, church people really don’t want to separate church and state and would rather impose their beliefs on everyone through government force.

Theocracy has been part of political debate since the evangelical folks hijacked the Republican Party several decades ago. I’ve always found it odd that Republicans stand for economic freedom but some of them want to impose a kind of Christian Sharia law on personal freedom. The Democrats wisely exploited social issues in the last election to divert attention from their dismal economic record.

What’s more puzzling is the growing antipathy toward religion: a sort of reverse theocracy. Atheists have been filing frivolous lawsuits for years but now are being taken seriously: a few municipal governments and school districts have gone to ridiculous lengths to banish any mention of Christmas or Easter from holiday celebrations in a kind of atheist Sharia law. How can so few atheists — about 5 percent of the population — afford so many lawyers? Perhaps they tithe. As a lapsed Unitarian, I’m practically an atheist myself but do not feel at all insulted that “In God We Trust” is printed on our money.

Fox News tut-tuts about a war on religion and may have a point. An increasingly non-religious population re-elected a government that forces Catholic institutions to provide free birth control and is unconcerned about the Arab Spring’s open season on Christians.

Time magazine has declared that the same-sex marriage debate is over and religious objections are irrelevant. Even the news media coverage of the new Pope was a little snarky at times. A few commentators sounded disappointed that the cardinals elected a Catholic. And one of the most popular musicals on Broadway makes fun of Mormons.

It’s ironic that nobody dares ridicule the Muslims, some of whom want to impose Sharia law for real. That’s probably because radical Islamists kill people when their feelings are hurt. I guess it’s prudent, but a little cowardly, to disparage only those religions that turn the other cheek.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. It’s refreshing to see the evangelical theocrats in retreat but stamping out religion, as the Communists tried to do, is no improvement. So far, Handel’s Messiah appears to be safe and nobody is messing with my marshmallow Peeps.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | 2 Comments

Best music I ever heard

Another story from my Navy days…

The hour before dawn usually is a quiet time aboard ship. On this morning all hands are on deck for underway replenishment, the regular delivery of fuel and supplies that sustains our tiny minesweeper on a two-month patrol off the Vietnamese coast. This is our lifeline for fuel, food, ammunition, spare parts and different movies. If we’re lucky there’s mail from home by way of the Philippines and an aircraft carrier in the Gulf of Tonkin.

We’re on course for a scheduled rendezvous with a seagoing gas station and supermarket known as an oiler. On the crowded bridge, we track the oiler on radar and establish voice radio contact. Both ships are darkened under wartime conditions, and we don’t see the other ship until floodlights are turned on when we’re a few hundred yards apart. On the deck below, men turn up dungaree jacket collars against a light rain and tropic night chill, and put on orange lifejackets and battered hard hats. The deck force is rigging cargo gear while the engine room gang prepares for refueling.

It’s called underway replenishment because both ships are moving. Once the oiler is in sight we approach the larger ship from behind to pull alongside. The oiler’s stern looms over us, higher than our bridge, as we batter through the big ship’s wake and along the grey cliff of her side to move into position 50 feet away.

A whistle blows and a shot line, a lightweight rope fired from a rifle, arcs over our ship and is caught. Heavier lines are pulled across, blocks and tackle are rigged and soon the two ships are strapped together with a trolley-like highline and a heavy fuel hose. Larger ships use winches but small ships like ours do it the old-fashioned way with a line of men digging their heels into the pitching deck to pull cargo nets of supplies and barrels of lube oil over the churning water between the two ships. Occasionally we transfer a man between ships in a specially designed chair.

On the bridge the officer of the deck focuses on holding our ship alongside the oiler, matching the larger ship’s course and speed and maintaining a 50-foot distance to keep the lines between the two ships taut. This is precision shiphandling: leaning over the bridge rail to concentrate on a rope with markings that measures the distance between the two hulls, and shouting orders down the voicepipe to the pilothouse below to correct the course one degree, two degrees, and adjust the speed of the engines a revolution or two at a time.

A telephone line has been rigged between the two ships and our captain is talking with the skipper of the oiler. Down on deck, a man signals the other ship with paddles to heave the line or pay it out. Signalmen on each ship exchange wisecracks in semaphore shorthand. Off-duty crewmen on the oiler peer down at us and wave.

Then we hear the music.

Music! High above us on the oiler’s focsle a band is playing, a combo of sailors in dungarees belting out a rock beat through a scratchy loudspeaker. They play in the rain, risking electrocution to entertain the two crews and making up for their lack of talent with raw amplification.

Centuries ago sailors on square-riggers used sea chanteys to add rhythm to the heavy work of raising sails and turning the capstan, and the oiler’s rock band does the same for us. The music breaks the tension on the bridge and brings smiles to the faces of the deck force.

Finally our tanks are full and the last cargo net has been emptied. Orders are passed for the breakaway and dripping ropes are pulled aboard. Once we are unstrapped from the oiler, the officer of the deck gives the order to turn away from the larger ship… and exhales.

The ship settles back into routine as the crew stows equipment and hoses and carries boxes of supplies below. The rain has stopped and the aroma of bacon cooking in the galley mixes with the diesel fumes from the stack. The oiler recedes from view as it continues up the coast to do it all over again, amateur musicians and all, for the next ship up the line. We will do this again ourselves in a few days. And there’s mail.

Posted in Sea Stories | Comments Off on Best music I ever heard

Budget cuts and bureaucrats

Booo! Sequestration is coming! Our military will be hollowed out! Toddlers will be ejected from Head Start classrooms! Our food will immediately spoil in the absence of federal inspectors! All medical research will be scrapped!

That’s what politicians and the news media are saying. Do you believe them? I don’t.

How drastic are the cuts? We’re talking about a 7 percent cut to defense and a 5 percent cut to federal agencies — most of which received double-digit budget increases in the last few years.

In the private sector,  budget cuts of this magnitude are not a big deal. When I was a manager in a Bell Telephone company during the telecommunications reorganization of the 1970s and 80s, annual budget cuts were routine. My group was chronically understaffed and absorbed additional responsibilities as the company downsized. In one case the department where I worked was cut by half.

But here’s the difference: Private companies need to compete for business and cannot afford cuts to customer service. So the telephone company I worked for cut thousands of jobs while leaving its service centers and installation-repair force at full strength. We eliminated layers of management, contracted-out support services and slashed headquarters staffs. It was a big change for us but our customers never noticed the difference.

There are many ways to cut an organization’s budget and managers have choices. So it’s always puzzled me that government agencies are unable to make cuts that won’t inconvenience the public. Can government bureaucrats be that inept as managers? Or, do they deliberately choose cuts that will have the most impact so that taxpayers will pony up? That’s the impression I get when my local school district cuts teaching positions without reducing administration, or when the state government cuts funding for daycare centers while leaving bureaucrats’ jobs intact.

So the coming federal sequestration is no catastrophe. It will pinch the Department of Defense, which has already taken budget cuts and is constrained by long-term commitments. But I suspect the decision to cancel deployment of an aircraft carrier is more showmanship than austerity.

Some government employees will be furloughed temporarily but will still have jobs – unlike the millions of private sector workers who lost jobs while the federal government added 250,000 employees between 2007 and 2011.

But this modest dent in the massive federal budget will play out as high drama. National parks will close. Programs for disadvantaged children will be curtailed. TV reporters will have a field day covering a daily drumbeat of public pain. And President Obama will travel around the country, at $181,000 an hour on Air Force One, to make his pitch for higher taxes.

No one is forcing the government to inconvenience the public. There are many other ways to save money. The government could declare a moratorium on travel and conferences. (The President could set the example by staying in Washington for a while.) Federal agencies could furlough their headquarters staffs and postpone issuing new regulations. The State Department could delay aid payments to places like Egypt and Palestine. Entire agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, could shut down completely for a month or two. But that won’t happen because nobody would notice.

Posted in Commentary | Comments Off on Budget cuts and bureaucrats

Background checks and American Express

One of the more sensible ideas emerging from the political soap opera of gun control is requiring a background check for everyone who purchases a firearm. That’s a great idea, but can we trust the government to do this? Not because the feds might use the data for sinister purposes, as some gun owners fear, but because there’s a good chance the government will screw it up.

Some government information systems work pretty well, of course: My Social Security checks are deposited on time and I’m certain the IRS will catch me if fail to file a tax return. But there also are spectacular failures such as widespread fraud in welfare payments and millions in erroneous tax refunds to incarcerated felons.

The Navy’s computers can guide a cruise missile to demolish a bunker hundreds of miles away. Yet when I was in the Naval Reserve my unit’s paychecks were regularly delayed or scrambled by the Navy’s computerized pay system. Different computer, I hope.

My home state of New Mexico has chronic problems managing information. Every year or so some sort of computer glitch causes massive inconvenience to citizens or employees. Most recently a bungled transition to a new computer system delayed unemployment benefit payments for thousands of people. The state’s paper-based prison records have resulted in the early release of dangerous felons.

The private sector seems to do a better job of housebreaking its databases. Banks, utilities and retailers routinely handle millions of transactions and errors are relatively rare. When someone tried to use my credit card number to book a flight in London last year, the airline caught it and the credit card company took immediate action.

Private companies also are better than government agencies at sharing information. If I apply for a Discover card, the folks there will know whether I’ve missed any payments on my Visa card. Yet judges in New Mexico often are unaware that a defendant has prior convictions in the next county or is registered as a sex offender in another state. The State of New Mexico is having difficulty verifying the citizenship status of registered voters because of delays in getting information from the federal Department of Homeland Security.

People laughed when former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich suggested outsourcing the immigration database to American Express to reduce errors and fraud. But if the feds are serious about keeping criminals from buying firearms, this may be the best solution for universal background checks for gun purchases.

Posted in Commentary | Comments Off on Background checks and American Express

Clinging to gun control

I can’t help getting cynical about the current political spasm of gun control. The horrific massacre of schoolchildren by a mentally unbalanced shooter unquestionably was a tragedy and demands action. So what’s the instinctive response? Make it harder for sane, law-abiding people to own guns.

President Obama’s anti-gun rhetoric is a bonanza for the firearms business and has significantly increased the number of weapons in circulation. The dramatic increase in gun sales may be his most successful economic stimulus to date. (What is it about the guy that makes people want to run out and buy a gun whenever he opens his mouth?)

Banning assault weapons sounds reasonable and I’m all for improving background checks. The problem is that restricting gun ownership has never deterred mass shootings, even in tightly regulated places like Norway. We’re kidding ourselves if we think this will prevent the next bloodbath. No gun control law will keep the homicidally deranged (or your average gangbanger) from getting firearms.

If we’re serious about preventing tragedy, it’s more productive to identify and treat a relatively small number of sick puppies than to limit the rights of millions of law-abiding gun owners. Mental health treatment was an afterthought in the President’s proposal. The state of Colorado is taking more substantive action with a proposal to expand mental health treatment and include commitment records in firearms background checks.

Treating the mentally ill saves their lives, too. Here in Albuquerque, we’ve seen a surge in shootings by police officers. Most of the victims had mental health problems and were shot when they displayed weapons and posed an apparent threat to the cops.

Unfortunately, overhauling mental health treatment is a complicated issue. It’s easier for politicians to demonize the National Rifle Association than pick a fight with the American Civil Liberties Union over the rights of the mentally ill.

The gun control argument also highlights our country’s cultural divide (and widens it, thanks to President Obama’s unerring instinct for wedge issues).

I grew up in gun control country: I knew very few gun owners, and support for gun control was the default position of most people I encountered. My hometown of Oak Park, Ill., was one of the first communities to enact a handgun ban in 1984 and even gratuitously declared itself a nuclear-weapon-free zone. I wrote a letter to the local paper: I’m okay with the handgun ban, but if we can’t have nuclear weapons how can we protect our families?

Now I live in gun country. New Mexico has no gun registration except for concealed-carry permits. Hunting is popular here, and it’s not unusual to hear about a homeowner or shopkeeper shooting a would-be robber. The state votes Democratic but its Congressional delegation gets favorable ratings from the NRA. Recently 30 of the state’s 33 county sheriffs held a news conference in Santa Fe to declare their opposition to the President’s assault weapons ban.

I suspect that New Mexico, and a lot of other states, are foreign to some of the media folks and academics who believe we should act more like Europeans and dismiss those who “cling to guns or religion.”

Personally, I am agnostic on guns. I’m grateful I never had to use the pistol I carried in Vietnam. I had lots of fun practice-shooting a Thompson submachine gun but have no desire to own one. Eventually I may get a handgun at home – my neighborhood has occasional burglaries – but am in no hurry. Most of my neighbors are armed and that makes me feel safer.

Posted in Commentary | 1 Comment

It doesn’t have to make sense (corporate edition)

My experience in the Navy was good preparation for a career in a giant corporation. That’s because both government and corporate bureaucracies do well-intentioned things that turn out to be idiotic and comical.

The Dilbert comic strip has a big following among corporate employees who are convinced that cartoonist Scott Adams worked for their company. (Actually, he worked for a unit of my company.)

The telephone company where I worked was well managed and did most things right, but perpetrated occasional nonsense when earnest ideas had unintended consequences. To encourage employees to show up for work, the company gave awards for perfect attendance. One of my people was a week away from a five-year attendance award when she came down with the flu. She dragged herself into work nevertheless, was awarded her pen-and-pencil set and infected several co-workers. My group’s attendance went to hell that month.

One year the company launched a massive employee suggestion program and, to encourage participation, awarded a prize to every employee who submitted a suggestion. So there were LOTS of suggestions, most of which were ill informed and utterly useless. As the publisher of the employee magazine, I had to respond to scores of suggestions claiming that some backwoods printer could print 50,000 copies of the magazine at lower cost than my high-volume supplier in Chicago. Then I started getting calls from printers — we just talked to your new purchasing agent – who quickly backed off when I explained our requirements.   

When I was the project manager of a departmental computer system, I was dismayed to learn that my modest array of off-the-shelf servers and word processors required the same approval process as a custom-built mainframe mega-system. The Kafkaesque labyrinth of reviews and approvals took a solid year and involved surreal conversations such as: Q- Why does the network planning department require two months to sign off on the project? A- They have to log it.

Bureaucratic procedures can be an excuse for merriment. A factory where I worked distributed a safety bulletin on every on-the-job injury and included a photo of the accident scene. Most of us didn’t read these bulletins. Then a hapless employee was injured in the washroom when he got up from the toilet and somehow bumped his head on the toilet paper dispenser. The safety guys were unable to resist issuing a bulletin on the freak accident with an obligatory photo of the toilet stall. Everybody read it.

In my post-corporate career as a freelancer my old company was one of my clients. One day I got a form letter from the accounting department announcing that all suppliers would be paid in 90 days instead of the customary 30 days. My first call was to the company’s local telephone office to ask if their new accounts payable policy meant I could pay my phone bill in 90 days. The service rep and I had a good laugh. I maintained my cash flow by raising my rates and offering a discount for payment in 30 days. I’ll bet most of the company’s suppliers did likewise.

Posted in Idle Ruminations | Comments Off on It doesn’t have to make sense (corporate edition)

It doesn’t have to make sense

When I was young and figuring out how to use my brain, I became fascinated with logic and was intensely frustrated when I encountered things that did not make sense. Then I joined the Navy and learned that reason and logic are desirable but not strictly necessary.

My training in Officer Candidate School probably was intended to make us adaptable and resilient. We were taught to march down the right side of the street and then suddenly were ordered to march on the left. It was not uncommon for the loudspeaker to announce a change in the uniform of the day as we were running out of the barracks for the morning formation. So I learned to cope with uncertainty and concluded that capricious nonsense was normal in the Navy.

On coastal patrol in Vietnam, we were required to check the papers of every junk we boarded. The papers were written in Vietnamese. None of us could read Vietnamese but we dutifully checked the papers every time. Yep, they’ve got papers.

When I led boarding parties I was instructed to have a pistol in my hand while supervising my team. Then we got orders to fill out a form for each junk we boarded, so I had a pistol and a clipboard. This presented a dilemma: what to do with the pistol while filling out the form. Ask the Vietnamese to hold the gun while I write? Not a good idea. So we assigned two officers to each boarding party: one to hold the gun and the other to fill out the form. During my first cruise to Vietnam I read Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 and understood it perfectly.

Fortunately, the Navy has people who counter official nonsense with clever pragmatism. When my reserve center had a shortage of lodging for weekend reservists, the commanding officer came up with a solution. “We found an unused building on the base that’s equipped with bunks,” he said. “We cannot use it officially as a barracks because that would require spending money we don’t have to bring the building up to code. But your guys can sleep there if they want. Just don’t call it a barracks.”

My retirement from the Naval Reserve was true to form. I submitted papers in August to retire in November. In September I was notified that as a superannuated senior officer, I would be reviewed by a continuation board and forced to retire if deemed useless to the Navy. I’m already retiring, I thought, so this doesn’t affect me. In November I officially retired: My paperwork was in order, they rang the bell and blew the bosun’s pipe, and everybody saluted. In December, however, I received a certified letter notifying me that I was AWOL for missing my reserve meeting and might be kicked out of the Navy. Finally, in January, I received a letter congratulating me that the continuation board had approved my retention in the Navy. This made no sense at all but, hey, my pension checks are arriving.

Posted in Sea Stories | 1 Comment